|
You ARE a Mormon aren't you, Dean? Was I functioning under
a misapprehension vis a vis you?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: October 13, 2005 10:59
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two (2) Major
Omissions vis a vis the Bible
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 10/13/2005 10:49:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two (2) Major
Omissions vis a vis the Bible
'Their source' is your human fallibility or, anyone
else's for that matter.
I leave aside Judy's villification. You can determine
that for yourself.
cd: And this from a man who follows a person
with the belief that there are 7 ft quakers on the moon-When is J.Smith
accountable?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: October 13, 2005 10:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two (2)
Major Omissions vis a vis the Bible
----- Original Message -----
To: [email protected]
Sent: 10/13/2005 10:09:51 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two (2)
Major Omissions vis a vis the Bible
Dean, you need to understand that if you do not
subscribe to Lance (and his particular mentors') theory
of "perichoresis" - that is the trinity all
dancing with one another - and "incarnational" type salvation where
the
whole world is included in the incarnation and
resurrection - then in his opinion you are probably doing
some
twisting along with the rest of us who do not
read this particular doctrine into the scriptures.
judyt
cd: Then it is my hope that Lance will
point our My "twisting areas" and we then can find their
source.
Sent: 10/13/2005 9:06:42 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
(2) Major Omissions vis a vis the Bible
Though I don't know you, Daen, I'm prepared to
grant your 'intent'. However, you have, you do and, you will
'unwittingly' twist Scripture. So unless you're prepared to say 1. I
never have 2. I do not do so now 3. I never will then, welcome to
the camp of , granted unwitting, Scripture twisters.
cd: If you notice me twisting
scripture Lance -by all means-tell me and I will give it the
attention it deserves.To be fair and not have respect of persons you
will have to do the same to J.Smith and how are you to know if
J.Smith or I am wrong? The Holy Bible is the Judge of such
matters.To claim it's truth as long as it is interpreting correctly
allows for some to twist the scripture to their own/your destruction
by interpreting it for you.
It needs to be said that, in actuality BOTH the Bible and
women/men are the problem.
So then, is anyone who 'twists
Scripture', by extension, a cultist?
THERE IS NOT ONE ON TT WHO HAS NOT
TWISTED SCRIPTURE, DOES TWIST SCRIPTURE AND, WILL TWIST
SCRIPTURE.!!
If you see yourself as THE
EXCEPTION to this 'twisting scripture' thingy then, please
identify yourself.
cd: With hand raised. God judges the intent of the act-I
don't intend to twist scripture. How can one have true
intentions by quoting someone who claimed there are 7 ft Quakers
on the moon. Doesn't honesty go with the belief in
Christ?
|
