Yes, I agree, Terry. And I think it poor theology to speculate on the matter as have some of the Mormon writers. BUT, if deegan , or Dean for that matter, intend to maintain their high level of insulting disagreement, pretending to know what cannot be known this side of Heaven, then they must know something that the rest of us do not know. I have said before that this particular discussion avoids the basic differences between the biblical message and the Mormon church.
I have probably read as much of this thread as I can stand. Time to move on, for me.
Jd
cd; Sound just like a Mormon to me-twisting the facts. All I said was that J Smith cannot be a prophet of God and make the claims that he has made. I then tell you of some of those claims-and the facts support what I have stated-as Kevin proved?We have never stated or claimed to know how the power in God impregnated Mary... other than "let there be light".May Jesus be praised! But I do have another claim and it is against you JD-You have you time to repent of course-I will be waiting.
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Clifton <
wabbits1234@earthlink.net>
To:
[email protected]Sent: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:30:27 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You miss my point, once again. I am interested in your views on the "how of the virgin birth - curiosity has the best of me.
===================================================================
Your curiosity will never be satisfied this side of Heaven, John. Details will be available then. Until then, we simply accept that God worked another miracle. We do not need to know how He did it. We just need to know why.
Terry
