RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]

[ShieldsFamily]

Ol’ Charlie has always been half a bubble off.  Also he is not a Believer.  I don’t think you are becoming a liberal—the comment just reminded me of how often the _expression_ “wrong choices” is used instead of “sin”—a definite euphemism used to excuse the sinner.  iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 8:31 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]   I had never before entertained  the idea that I might be politically correct. Are you sure about this?  What if ol' Charley is just not too bright?  Would that be a sin? Is there some indication here that I may be becoming liberal in my old age? ShieldsFamily wrote: Ever notice that instead of using the word “Sin” today, the politically correct term is “mistake” or “wrong choices”? iz   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 6:43 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]   Bingo!  You got it.  You are not the idiot.  Prince Charles is.  He seems to have an uncanny ability to make the wrong choices. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Who is the "prince" and who is calling me an idiot?   I am not following.   The correct response to the story I posted is something along the lines of "Geee, that's too bad for these girls."    how can there be any controversy over this story?  The URL addresses listed below give no information.  Aaaahhh --  wait a minute.   Your subject line  --  does that have anything to do with the url addresses?   The idiot is Prince Charles ??!!!   Amazing  --  I got all that from the subject line, if correct.   Am I on the right track, here.     The sad thing about Islam is this  --  perhaps 60 % of them {world wide]    are non-violent but I would bet that nearly  100% would side with the killers if push came to shove.  Their holy men and congregations have done virtually nothing to counter that claim since years before 9-11.   Whether motivated by fear of their own people or not,  I could not care less.   All that is necessary for evil to triumph is .............   a statement that most certainly applies to  the "peaceful" among the Muslims.      Have you forgotten,  the day the towers fell, friends were there, going through a living hell.     John   -----Original Message----- From: Terry Clifton <wabbits1234@earthlink.net> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:15:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush] You posted a story about three school girls beheaded by muslims.  Now the prince wants us to know that they are not really bad people. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What does this mean?   JD     -----Original Message----- From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org> Sent: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:29:45 -0500 Subject: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush] Get out you story about the girls being murdered and sent it to this idiot, John  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/30/nchas30.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/10/30/ixportaltop.html