On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:27:35 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
jt met a bear. The bear met jt The bear was bulgy. The bulge was jt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:while there's (partic jts) doctrinal demandS, then there's more than one requirement for meaning (even in her own mind)On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:14:28 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:||No but, people will continue to do so.jtDo you think it should be chameleon like for ppl to form it into whatever shape fits their doctrinal demands?

