Re: [TruthTalk] apostles and prophets

Wed, 04 Jan 2006 16:31:21 -0800

 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
To: [email protected];[email protected]
Sent: 1/4/2006 6:31:53 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] apostles and prophets

Next time you want to get my attention, you might try this, "HEY, JOHN !!!!!!!!"
 
:-)   
 
And I still miss the point.   In your example, am I the hero or a pimp for Satan? 
 
jd
cd: In my example you are the hero portrayed as a "pimp"-In actually Mormons would fill the role of "pimp" as they portray the gospel of Christ as evil. My advice would be to stay alert-once one look into the abyss it also looks back. No surprise that you Mormon relations didn't inform you of this play.Makes one wonder what is hidden in the dark recesses of the Mormon Temple.
 
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:
Sent: 1/4/2006 2:43:00 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] apostles and prophets

What is this?  
 
 
 Dave, in your temple ceremony, who does it depict Satan paying to preach  his  message?

cd: A Baptist Preacher/Pastor as JD is.
cd: In one of the temple plays a Baptist preacher correctly preaches the Gospel-as told by the Bible -and then Satan enter the stage and rewards the preacher for his good work for him. I have not seen the play but have spoken to people who have and also have read upon the subject-I believe this play is also put on in Mormons schools but not sure-maybe Blain can enlighten us of this?DavH has heard your words before John.I mentioned your name to get your attention to this subject matter.
 
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To:
> > Date: 1/3/2006 9:03:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] apostles and prophets
> >
> > Dave, in your temple ceremony, who does it depict Satan paying to preach
> his
> > message?
>
> cd: A Baptist Preacher/Pastor as JD is.
> >
> >
> > >From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: [email protected]
> > >To: [email protected]
> > >Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] apostles and prophets
> > >Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 01:21:18 -0800
> > >
> > >* "Protestants" are just one detestable gro up of pagans in the group of
> > >"gentiles". *
> > >*
> > > Doesn't it seem interesting that DaveH finds such intrique with a
> pagan
> > >group like the "protestants".*
> > >
> > >DAVEH: What's with the pagan stuff, Perry. That sounds like something
> > >you guys have called me, but FTR......I do not want any TTers to think
> for
> > >one second that I consider any of you folks to be pagans.
> > >
> > > As for your mention of.........
> > >
> > >/*they call everyone who is not a mormon a "gentile"*/
> > >
> > >..........You really do not understand the nature of what that means, so
> > >you might want to be careful about pretending to know something you
> don't.
> > >It reflects poorly on your image, Perry.
> > >
> > >*he insists on calling us "protestants" as a disrespect.*
> > >
> > >DAVEH: Nonsense. I will give you the same advice I gave John.....If
> you
> > >can't quote me exactly, then don't pretend to quote me at all by putting
> > >words in my mouth. FTR........I have much more respect for Protestants
> > >than you will ever imagine, and as such I certainly have more respect
> for
> > >Protestants than I do for those who misquote me.
> > >
> > >Charles Perry Locke wrote:
> > >
> > >> John, there is a higher level division amongst the mormons.../*they
> > >>call everyone who is not a mormon a "gentile"*/.* "Protestants" are
> just
> > >>one detestable group of pagans in the group of "gentiles". *
> > >>*
> > >> Doesn't it seem interesting that DaveH finds such intrique with a
> pagan
> > >>group like the "protestants".* Their own founder claimed the mormon god & amp; lt; B R>> > >>told him that he should join NO denomination, and that ALL
> denominations
> > >>were an abomination. As you have stated, even though most on this group
> do
> > >>not consider themselves "protestants" per se and have identified
> > >>themselves as being members of the church Jesus started, being members
> of
> > >>the body of Christ, *he insists on calling us "protestants" as a
> > >>disrespect.* If he respected us he would call us what we are...members
> of
> > >>the body of Christ. Christians.
> > >>
> > >>Perry
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>David, do you understand how the Mormons use this word "protestant?"
> Do
> > >>>you understand that I do not like that characterization? Do you
> > >>>understand that it is gross sectaria nism that in si sts on the
> separation
> > >>>between RCC and those who reject papel authority? Do you know that
> there
> > >>>are millions of Catholics who do not accept Papel authority? Do you
> > >>>understand that I have a right to expect not to be branded with a
> Mormon
> > >>>slang word used by them to describe all who are not of "the [Mormon]
> > >>>truth?" "protestant" is another way of saying "unbeleiver" or "pagan."
>
> > >>>We are not fooling anyone, here. I have seen their chat rooms !!
>
> > >>> Do you understand that when DH uses this word, he necessarily
> > >>>attaches to it ideas that are definitely not of my approveal?
> > >>>
> > >>>This should be an easily resolved issue. But it is not. The
> Mormons
> > >>>insist on using this word because that is what their bud s do, in
> ; private.
> > >>> All Mormons I know use this word and in the same manner as Blaine
> and
> > >>>DH. Get off the pot and smell the roses. You are not scoring any
> > >>>points with the Mormons in this.
> > >>>
> > >>>jd
> > >>>
> > >>>-------------- Original message --------------
> > >>>From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>
> > >>>John, do you understand the difference between a historical
> perspective
> > >>>and a philosophical one?
> > >>>
> > >>>Let's consider the philosophical concern a little more closely. A
> > >>>Protestant is defined broadly as a member of a church that rejects
> papal
> > >>>authority.
> > >>>
> > >>>-------------
> > >>& gt;Pr ot·es·ta nt > > >>>[noun]
> > >>>member of church rejecting papal authority: a member or adherent of
> any
> > >>>denomination of the Western Christian church that rejects papal
> authority
> > >>>and some fundamental Roman Catholic doctrines, and believes in
> > >>>justification by faith.
> > >>>
> > >>>Microsoft® Encarta® Reference Library 2005. © 1993-2004 Microsoft
> > >>>Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > >>>-------------
> > >>>
> > >>>Aimee rejected papal authority. Do you, John, accept or reject the
> > >>>authority of the pope as being the vicar of Christ?
> > >>>
> > >>>Peace be with you.
> > >>>David Miller.
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > ----------
> > "L et you r speech be alw ays with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
> know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how
> you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend
> who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to