Bill wrote: > If you do like the label, then please cease with > the ad hominem arguments, attaching me to > the fathers and dismissing my comments on > the basis of that association; for when you do > that, you are employing a fallacious form of > argumentation.
Attaching you to the fathers is not an ad hominem argument. It is no different than calling the LDS adherents in this forum "Mormons." It is, however, a fallacious form of argumentation. You are no more wrong for reading the church fathers and accepting some of what they say than DaveH is wrong for reading the Book of Mormon. It would be fallacious for someone to argue with DaveH by saying, "but the Book of Mormon taught you that, or the Mormon church taught you that, so you must be wrong!" Bill wrote: > Judy, I am asking you to please address the > content of my statements. Rebut them if you > wish -- with Scripture or whatever other source > you would like to use ... Yes, Judy, please oblige Bill in this regard. Thanks. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
