[TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)

[Judy Taylor]

Lance writes: Judy, in a post moments ago, acknowledged that she cannot be but what she is. This is how I read Judy. This is how I accept Judy. I do find her to be REGULARLY but, UNINTENTIONALLY offensive to others. My concern would be that such has been pointed out to her often. She adopts a 'I must be true to the Scriptures' approach.   There are others besides you with concerns Lance.  My concern is that you and others who see the need to ask these kinds of questions  see themselves as so loving, doctrinally sound, and unoffensive.  Kind of like the king with no clothes. judyt     ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org> Sent: January 11, 2006 07:57 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)     > JD wrote: >> Have I gone over your head with the use >> of this phrase?  Look up ad hom and you >> will find "begging the question" in there >> somewhere.   You have no idea just how >> ridiculous this makes you sound. > > Please stop attacking Judy!  PLEASE! > > You are plain wrong about this idea you have that "ad hom" and "begging > the > question" are the same thing.  THEY ARE NOT.  I don't have the time right > now to educate you on the differences.  Maybe the moderator can help, or > maybe you can look it up for yourself.  Furthermore, "begging the > question" > is allowed on TruthTalk.  It is not a good form of argumentation, but you > will not find me or any other moderator reprimanding someone on the list > for > begging the question.  It is up to the TruthTalk members themselves to > recognize it and help others see the problem in their argumentation.  The > ad > hominem argument is not allowed because e-mail is sensitive to this > fallacious form of argumentation in that it inflames the emotions of > others > and causes posts like this one that you just made. > > The reason you might have seen a list with "begging the question" and "ad > hom" together is because these are two different forms of fallacious > argumentation.  You were probably reading a list of fallacious arguments. > THEY ARE NOT THE SAME.  Please correct your misunderstanding of these > terms. > Even if your attacks upon Judy were allowed in this forum, you should do > so > from an informed and educated position or you will be the one who looks > ridiculous. > > David Miller. > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may > know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) > http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a > friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. >     ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org   If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.