David,
I am speaking post DBR; in the book of Acts
and in the Epistles we do not find
the
great emphasis on the "incarnation" that we
are hearing in some circules today.
The apostle Paul preached the cross
and spoke to Festus of righteousness,
temperance, and the judgment to come
(Acts 24:25) until Felix trembled and
put off
dealing with it until later. Why
didn't Paul speak to him of "incarnational
ontology"
so that he would feel better and not be so
upset?
judyt
Judy wrote:
> In the meantime though I would like to ask
why
> you and some of the others on TT put so much
>
emphasis on the "incarnation" when Paul and the
> apostles
preached the "cross"? Does this disparity
> not ever
bother you? Why didn't they go about everwhere
> preaching the
"incarnaton?"
Judy, the cross and the incarnation is related to each
other. The reason
they did not preach the incarnation per se
was because the incarnation of
God was right there among
them. Furthermore, even now, I do not PREACH the
incarnation. I preach Christ. However, I might TEACH
about the incarnation
to help our understanding of what made Jesus
unique.
The apostle John wrote:
John 1:14
(14) And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among
us, (and we beheld his
glory, the glory as of the only begotten of
the Father,) full of grace and
truth.
This is the incarnation, Judy. The Word was made
flesh.
John also wrote the following:
1 John 4:2
(2) Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit
that confesseth that
Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of
God:
Do you confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh? If
so, then you too
believe in the Incarnation.
David Miller.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned
with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man."
(Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to
join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and he will be subscribed.
