Bizarre theories? Your pastor and the leadership at BSF teach what is essentially being taught here by David, Bill, Lance, and others. You want Dean to believe that we are the minority, the bizarre, the weido's. .................... when it is you (and maybe Dean) who stands alone on this point. Your position is the very definition of bizarre. ROL Judy.
jd
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Judith H Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I find it quite amazing Dean that these people can just ignore scriptures like those you postbelow and go on and on about bizarre theories that contradict the clear word of truth, I thankGod for you... because even DM appears taken in by this one.On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 20:47:15 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Sent: 2/1/2006 1:48:09 PMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?I John 5:20 "-- Jesus is the true God."Making a distinction between "Lord" and "God" is to misunderstand exactly what Peter was saying when he pronounced Jesus as Lord and Messiah (Acts 2:36).Peter is saying that Christ is both God and Messiah !!!!!!!-----------------------------------------------------cd:John I am giving two passages that shows a difference between God and Christ and before the group jumps the gun and call me a heretic I am not saying that Jesus isn't part of the Godhead because He is. To answer more mailers I have to move on but there is a difference to those whom would see.Mat 22:44
The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thyfootstool? Mat 19:17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
jd----- Original Message -----Sent: 1/31/2006 7:23:52 PMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?I am rethinking that as Christ said only God is good-I now find that one piece is sweeter than the other-but God gave all power to Christ so He now is also sweeter-think about it and slow down stating on what I believe-thanks bro..cdjd responds:You write it - I think you believe it, Dean. Tell me in the following exactly where I am speaking for you.Look at the following: I say "I hope you are not coming to a decision that Jesus ... was not God in the flesh" and you say " "That seems to be the direction .."I will not slow down when referencing what you write.cd: I am stating that Christ is the Lord not God John-and as such is part of the GodHead-Judy is right on the Trinity issue-it leads one to mistake who Christ is. But you took that a step farther and seem to think I am anti-Christ as you think Judy is. Wrong on both counts.jd----- Original Message -----Sent: 1/31/2006 12:37:43 AMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?Dean, I hope that you are coming to a decision that Jesus in the flesh was not God in the flesh. This is a very serious matter.jdcd; That seems to be the direction but I want the deeper level of understanding John-revolving around the:" Why call me good only God is good." statement of Chris..
