----- Original Message -----
From:
To: [email protected];[email protected]
Sent: 2/8/2006 5:08:44 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Moderator

Your question concerning me is disingenuous  at best.  We have had several off line exhanges in which I made  clear the issue.   Your question in the public forum reveals a lot about your character as relates to your sense of integrity. 
 
jd
cd: John I don't know why you insist on bring the private discussion (telling others to go straight to...)we had to a public forum. Will you please stop it. Concerning this topic (move on)you asked it in public and nowhere did we make it private-you actually posted it twice to ensure it was public. From now on this is also a private topic and if you wish to discuss it go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/8/2006 3:12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Moderator

Everyone has their own moderating style.  Let's give Dean a chance and see what he does with the list.  Nothing is wrong with him encouraging threads that are profitable and discouraging threads that are not.
 
I do note, however, that Lance made several ad hominem style references, such as attributing "cranial denseness" to me.  Whatever that means, I don't think it was meant to be flattering.  Do you think such remarks should be encouraged?

David Miller.
 
cd: Thanks for your support David-if you notice at the bottom of Lances letter he also told us to move on and covered the very thing I thought was problematic-so why is JD upset?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Moderator

Dean  --  are you going to micro-manage all our discussions?   I am interested in Lances point of view on this and want to see more  -  from Lance and DM an DH.
 
DM  --  is this the purpose of the Moderator -  to micro-manage our discussion and decide when a particualr discussion needs to "move along?" 
 
jd
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Lance Muir
Sent: 2/8/2006 6:31:04 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Is the list owner impervious to sanctions when baseless charges are levelled by him?

As I see it DM owes DH a profound apology for his interminable dragging out of a most minor issue.THAT, David Miller, is the cranial denseness to which I made reference during our recent exchange. You are 'The very model of a modern major-general'. Gilbert & Sullivan were describing you prior to your birth.
 
cd: Lance I will decide who owes whom an apology. As I see it this issue was settled. Let not repeat mistakes of others by bringing this back up thanks. Move alone folks- nothing to see here.
 
Further DM, please spare us the tired old arguments re: that which you actually mean by 'perfection'.  Phil Spector, in his song performed by the Teddy Bears alluded to DM in his lyrics 'To know, know, know him is to love, love, love him.'. So then DM, if it is simply affirmation or, as Denny Crane would say 'hug?' then, we collectively affirm and hug you.
 
OK! shall we move on. This ain't court, DM!!

Reply via email to