|
Can one 'truthfully' (Christine?) conclude such an
post with 'blessings'?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 15, 2006 09:22
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave
H. get bathing suit.
Thanks for the drive-by, Christine.
--------------
Original message --------------
From: Christine Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JD
wrote:
Your agenda has done nothing in a
positive way for this forum. Nothing.
I have been
blessed many times by Dean's posts. From what I can remember, he has always
quoted relevant scripture.
The above sentence you have written has
done nothing in a positive way for this forum,
JD.
Blessings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You pass out scripture as if you have proven your point!!
. Virtually none of the scripture I have seen you quote has much to
do with any of the discussions in which they are used.
This is a case in point. The Canadian Bishop says
this: "It ain't up to you Dean,
to 'allow' a fool to continue in her/his folly. My goodness, just look at
TT!"
and you quote a passage that speaks of the
innate value of scripture and has NOTHING to do with giving you
"authority" to go out into the world pointing fingers of
judgment as if you are getting something done for the
Lord. In fact, I Cor 5:11-13 tells you NOT to do
what you do.
Finally, Dean, this II Tim
passage not only says NOTHING in defense of what you do as a
SP (and even on this forum), it is information given "that the
man of God " might be complete. The reproof and correction
mentioned in this passage is directed AT THE MAN OF GOD THAT HE MIGHT BE
THOROUGLY FURNISHED and NOT anyone in the world !!!!
Finally, you miss the point when Lance
says "My goodness, just look at TT!"
Do you miss his point? Your agenda
has done nothing in a positive way for this forum.
Nothing.
jd
--------------
Original message --------------
From: "Dean Moore"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
2/14/2006 7:18:26 AM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
It ain't up to you Dean, to
'allow' a fool to continue in her/his folly. My goodness, just look at
TT!
cd: That is not what the
Bible says Lance.This has been given many times you should study
it.
2Ti 3:16 All Scripture is
given by inspiration of God, and is
profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for
instruction in righteousness:
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 14, 2006 07:10
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing
suit.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/13/2006 10:38:50 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get
bathing suit.
the Judge himself actually
judges ppl with understanding, gentlemen--he engenders
understanding with wisdom and righteousness as he goes, as
he renders truth truthfully among us who know him--the stark
contrast of your spirits & methods provoke me (to comment:)
(in this context:)
cd Such as-"I can understand why you committed
adultery with that women-she is beautiful". No clear rights and
wrongs -no strong stance against sin-Satan must love this
religion as there no fear involved Gary. Yes, one must use
wisdom and understanding if remorse is shown by the transgressor
and patience should be shown to the young-but to allow a fool to
continue in his folly is not caring about the soul of the fool or
the ones the fool will harm.
..& the Moderator
smugly postures himself the same way as you do, Bro;
e.g.:
"..not to [separate the two
G] would make one prone to error.
Error
#2"
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
February 12, 2006 15:02
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
you copied and
pasted...from another site without actually going to
it
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
intrinsically,
below, [& above] you've
postured yourself to (be) Judge [in
public insinuating what you want ppl to think--which in
truth is not 'witholding
judgement']
I have withheld
judgment
||
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday, February 13, 2006 10:35 AM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing
suit.
then, like the
Moderator, you also Judge ppl in
your finitude within v narrow human limits
(with perfection, of course)
What I did not
understand, and still don't understand, is why Gary
did not post the other information on that
page.
What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo!
Autos
|
