|
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/19/2006 10:34:13 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
The remarkably brazen confidence shown by you, DM and JT with respect to your own abilities is quite astounding, CD.
cd: That is because we know Jesus's expectations-and we know to live by those words is to live/walk in Him who is out confidence. It is like knowing that if we try with a true heart-he will help us the rest of the way Lance therefore Satan has no claim on us because we don't fall under his rule by sinning-and if we stumble into the trap of sin-with fear- we pour out our forgiveness before God and go on in our walk:-)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 19, 2006 10:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/19/2006 10:11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
You really don't know do you, Dean? Thanks for your concern, Dean. I'm confident to be found in that day in Him. When I read SOME of that 'theologizing' done by DM, CD, JT et al, I'm confident that not one but THAT ONE is without sin.
cd: Then you are living by one verse and placing you immortal soul one that line-of no concern of even keeping God commandments(moral law)-then very thing the entire world will be judged on according to the Bible-Which teaches us how to be sinless.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 19, 2006 10:03
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/19/2006 9:24:32 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
Just one (1) gospel, Dean. Mine. Seriously Dean, you've obviously read the Scriptures with some care and, developed from that 'reading' a pretty decent theology. It is but one (1) of a myriad of theologies extant throughout the believing communities worldwide. Relax Dean, I've no doubt that some of what you believe is quite true while some, all theological reflection being provisional, is not.
cd: I will relax when I get to heaven till then this is part of my suffering-concern for your soul, Lance-which I have chosen to receive. As you know the Bible states that we will be hated by the whole world as one of the signs of Christianity-but we are to not to worry/rather be of good cheer because they hated our master before they hated us-and we are not greater than He is. Tell me of all the "myriad of theologies extant throughout the believing communities worldwide" which one do you see hated the most and that put emphasis one living the entire word of God? Answer that and you will know the truth and the lie(S). Remember we can support all of our belief by the complete word of God.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 19, 2006 09:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/19/2006 8:39:59 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
I don't know you as God knows you, Dean. However, from what I read it'd appear that your 'soul'' (have you actually got one of those?) is in no danger. You just disagree with me along with a multitude of other believers. No surprise there, Dean.
cd: Then if my soul (which we all have and is the property of God that has to be returned back to him in a shape he will receive it- not throw it away because of the deformities of sin) is in no danger and you are teaching opposite from me do you not consider your soul be in danger?Are there two gospels Lance?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 19, 2006 08:34
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/19/2006 8:15:40 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
I am truly at a loss myself Dean, when I encounter those who do not agree with that which God has shown so clearly in the whole of the Scriptures along with history/logic/language/ &every imagineable discipline. The outcome of the foregoing is, of course, the truth. Which truth, you ask? Well..mine, of course. So then, to disagree with me IS to disagree with God.
cd: Then to determine which is correct what standard does one use Lance-if not the word of GOD Lance? Tell me and I will look into this other truth because according to your statements the one I am using (entire word of God) isn't the correct truth so I am in danger and my soul is at risk. What would you tell me to help my soul Lance?Please help me see my error for using the complete word of God??
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 19, 2006 08:02
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/18/2006 12:14:28 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fem. God- Dave H. get bathing suit.
Gary appears to be 'reading the same bible' as I am, Dean. Hmmmmmmmmm? I guess the obvious question would then be..........
cd: The only thing it could be Lance is which part do you and Gary ignore and which part do you believe?I personally think that the whole should be researched and formed into one's doctrine. This is the core of our discussion/debates within this entire group-How much of the Bible does one believe-whole or part? Epaphras believed others could do this and prayed to God for this- why not us Lance?Would he pray for the impossible.
Col 4:12 Epaphras, who is one of you, a servant of Christ, saluteth you, always laboring fervently for you in prayers, that ye may stand perfect and complete in all the will of God.
These guys didn't believe in the whole word of God either.
Mar 7:13 Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
But I am at a loss on how to convince one who will not receive the whole by using the truth of the whole that they deny-to make my point. A paradox then exists and confusion reins that God is not the author of-that then only leaves Satan's handiwork-You know the one who promotes sin against God's commandments that you group declares one does not have to keep.
|
