|
Look 'em up. I'm for the former and, agin' the
latter. It seems to me that each believes their understanding of the truth
to be THE understanding of the truth. Each attempts to demonstrate the
foregoing by employing means generally acceptable to all participants. When
arriving at an impasse, persons just agree to disagree or, think of those
with whom they disagree as unwilling/unable to SEE their (read THE) TRUTH.
Persons also testify to the presence of their truth in their lives. Persons
suggest some variation on illumination/enlightenment/Divine confirmation of
their truth.
How and, in what ways have I mischaracterized TT
since its inception?
|
- [TruthTalk] Plurality vs Pluralism - Who is believing/teach T... Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs Pluralism - Who is believin... David Miller
- RE: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs Pluralism - Who is believin... Dean Moore
- Re: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs Pluralism - Who is believin... Dean Moore
- Re: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs Pluralism - Who is believin... Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs Pluralism - Who is believin... Dean Moore

