Look 'em up. I'm for the former and, agin' the latter. It seems to me that each believes their understanding of the truth  to be THE understanding of the truth. Each attempts to demonstrate the foregoing by employing means generally acceptable to all participants. When arriving at an impasse, persons just agree to disagree or,  think of those with whom they disagree as unwilling/unable to SEE their (read THE) TRUTH. Persons also testify to the presence of their truth in their lives. Persons suggest some variation on illumination/enlightenment/Divine confirmation of their truth.
 
How and, in what ways have I mischaracterized TT since its inception?  

Reply via email to