|
We would appear to agree wholeheartedly, Dean. Now,
send the same message to Judy, DM, Gary and.........wait a second...has everyone
else fled? Hmmm, one wonders as to whether they fled 'cause, on matters of some
import, they 'read' the Bible differently?
Perhaps DM should pull the plug on TT so as not to
encourage, what did you call it, 'a doctrine of complexity that even a collA(e
sp)ge graduate would fall short (of) understanding and you or SATAN has placed
people around yourself that (are) is supporting this complex error."? You would,
I trust Dean, allege the same of Judy, David and Gary, would you
not?
By the way Dean, if a child can understand it then,
would you say that Judy doesn't need her 'study helps' and DM doesn't require
skills in ancient languages, logic etc.?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 24, 2006 06:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs
Pluralism - Who is believing/teach THE TRUTH?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/24/2006 5:58:24 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs
Pluralism - Who is believing/teach THE TRUTH?
Dean says to Lance "their is only ONE
TRUTH...the Bible wording supports OUR TRUTH" Further, "I have tried
to teach you...(the Bible truth, the One truth, our truth.. concerning sin)"
I posted the course notes on Christology for
you to see the diversity, Dean. In Mad Magazine it was Spy vs Spy whereas on
TT, in the churches and, in life it is ideaology vs ideaology, religion vs
religion, belief vs belief and, yes Dean, even SCRIPTURE VS SCRIPTURE.
I suggest that you live out that which you
believe God has shown you.
cd: I think this is good advice
and I am trying to do just that Lance. My advice to you is to forget all the
different "isms" in these other views as they have IMO lead you into
confusion.God wrote in a language so simple that even a child could
understand-what you hold for truth is a doctrine of complexity that even a
collage graduate would fall short understanding-and you or Satan has
placed people around yourself that is supporting this complex error. Simply
read the Bible for your self and draw you own conclusions from those written
words and-as you say live by those
words-respectfully.
Original Message -----
Sent: February 24, 2006 05:33
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs
Pluralism - Who is believing/teach THE TRUTH?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/22/2006 7:18:44 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Plurality vs
Pluralism - Who is believing/teach THE TRUTH?
Look 'em up. I'm for the former and, agin'
the latter. It seems to me that each believes their understanding of the
truth to be THE understanding of the truth. Each attempts to
demonstrate the foregoing by employing means generally acceptable to all
participants. When arriving at an impasse, persons just agree to
disagree or, think of those with whom they disagree as
unwilling/unable to SEE their (read THE) TRUTH. Persons also testify to
the presence of their truth in their lives. Persons suggest some
variation on illumination/enlightenment/Divine confirmation of their
truth.
cd:The problem I see
with your reasoning Lance - Respectfully- is that the Bible wording
supports our truth (ie. And there is only one truth). We can back up
what we say with the word of God with harmony through the entire
Bible- these others you mentioned cannot. I have tried to teach you
about sin and the consequences of sin even on a believer. Can you use
the Bible to teach me once saved always saved?
How and, in what ways have I
mischaracterized TT since its
inception?
|
