DH has chosen The Mormon religion. To insult his religion is akin to the "cartoon incident' re: the Muslims.
Is it wrong to insult a religion? Lance, what are your thoughts regarding the Cartoon wars?
-Christine
PS- Thanks for the invite, Dean. I will try to become as active as my studies allow. (emphasis on the "as my studies allow" part.)
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I disagree. DH has chosen The Mormon religion. To insult his religion is akin to the "cartoon incident' re: the Muslims. If John Lennon were to have been my brother then, I'd most assuredly receive that as an personal insult.----- Original Message -----From: Dean MooreSent: February 26, 2006 09:06Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list members-ModeratorComment***************----- Original Message -----From: Lance MuirSent: 2/26/2006 7:34:48 AMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list members-ModeratorComment***************IFO took your, and Judy's, evaluation of John Calvin to be nothing short of an insult. However, should you 'rule' on this matter thus eliminating your/my assessment to be off limits then, we would have no ongoing dialogue.cd: Maybe to John Calvin but not towards you-see the difference?If the truth insults then that person needs to change not the truth. If I were to say that John Lennon was a pig-that is acceptable as I am not making a personal attack on you.But if I were to insult you by calling you names then I have personally attacked you and would be in error to do so Lance. If I were to say to DavH : Mormons are stupid I have not attacked DavH but rather my attack was on the teaching of Mormonism. In short-express your self but don't let it get personal.By the way, wasn't there some kind of mystery 'rule' about not responding to posts with the above subject heading?No-there isn't any "new rule". This is the same rule Perry enforced. If I make the call that someone has broken the Ad. Hom. rule- that protects others from verbal assaults- then reply to that in private. If I did not enforce this then the issue of that person wrongs will become part of the debate and become unsolvable as others got involved.-this is for you protection as well as others. The non-enforcing of some past Moderators has lead to many good minds leaving this site.If these attacks continue Lance it will only be a couple of people here and how long can two /three people carry on the same conversation?----- Original Message -----From: Dean MooreSent: February 26, 2006 07:10Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list members-Moderator Comment***************----- Original Message -----From: Lance MuirSent: 2/26/2006 4:13:42 AMSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list members-Moderator Comment***************You spoke my question "G"?????????Moderator-This simply means that the rules against insults and personal attacks are going to be unforced by me-others are under my protection and will get fair treatment-I owe that to God not to those who will not keep their agreement and abide by the rules.----- Original Message -----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: February 25, 2006 18:07Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list members-Moderator Comment***************ftr, what does this mean?On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:40:32 -0500 "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:I plan on enforcing the rules of protection on TT against those who love ch[ao]s
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
