-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
2/26/2006 7:34:48 AM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list
members-ModeratorComment***************
IFO took your, and Judy's,
evaluation of John Calvin to be nothing short of an insult. However,
should you 'rule' on this matter thus eliminating your/my assessment to
be off limits then, we would have no ongoing
dialogue.
cd: Maybe to
John Calvin but not towards you-see the difference?If the truth insults
then that person needs to change not the truth. If I were to say that
John Lennon was a pig-that is acceptable as I am not making a personal
attack on you.But if I were to insult you by calling you names then I
have personally attacked you and would be in error to do so Lance. If I
were to say to DavH : Mormons are stupid I have not attacked DavH but
rather my attack was on the teaching of Mormonism. In short-express your
self but don't let it get personal.
By the way, wasn't there some
kind of mystery 'rule' about not responding to posts with the above
subject heading?
No-there isn't
any "new rule". This is the same rule Perry enforced. If I make the call
that someone has broken the Ad. Hom. rule- that protects others from
verbal assaults- then reply to that in private. If I did not enforce
this then the issue of that person wrongs will become part of the
debate and become unsolvable as others got involved.-this is for you
protection as well as others. The non-enforcing of some past Moderators
has lead to many good minds leaving this site.If these attacks continue
Lance it will only be a couple of people here and how long can two
/three people carry on the same
conversation?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 26, 2006 07:10
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list
members-Moderator Comment***************
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 2/26/2006 4:13:42 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To all list
members-Moderator Comment***************
You spoke my
question "G"?????????
Moderator-This simply means that the rules
against insults and personal attacks are going to be unforced by
me-others are under my protection and will get fair treatment-I owe
that to God not to those who will not keep their agreement and abide
by the rules.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 25, 2006
18:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] *********** To
all list members-Moderator
Comment***************
ftr, what does this
mean?
I plan on enforcing the rules of
protection on TT against those who love
ch[ao]s