|
How can that (my interpretation implies Dean) be
wrong? Where does one go from here? Your honour, my client pleads
insanity.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 07, 2006 18:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of
truthtalk?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 3/7/2006 6:04:30 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit'
of truthtalk?
Follow your conscience, Dean. Sometimes your
conscience is directed by God but, sometimes....
cd: I do not preach another conscience Lance-I
preach the written word of God -from the Bible itself-again words have
meaning and it is written in English .How can that be
wrong?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 06, 2006 20:56
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit'
of truthtalk?
cd: Is speaking of the greatness if Christ "objective" to you
Lance? That is what I we do. Would you like to come and hear me speak-or
Kevin? He is Just across the falls and I will meet you there? We only
encourage others to come to Jesus-why are we wrong to do
so?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 3/6/2006 12:23:25 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
'spirit' of truthtalk?
Me too, Dave. When TRUELY OBJECTIONABLE
BEHAVIOUR is objected to (by 'acting out') these persons occasionally do
seem surprised.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 06, 2006 10:43
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
'spirit' of truthtalk?
DAVEH: OK Dean, I understand your sensitivity to
such and will respond without using the words you find objectionable.
I would like to continue to discuss this, as I find it
interesting to see how SPers think.
I am
curious as to why one would still show up on somebody's doorstep when
an objectionable topic is mentioned rather than discuss it with them
via the phone or email? What is to be accomplished by a personal
visit? Most folks would understand such a visit to be a physical
threat, even though it could be claimed that the offended has a
constitutional right to confront the
offender.
The reason I ask this is because
it seems to me that many SPers seemed surprised that they are
physically attacked when confronting sinners on the streets. Yet
they feel compelled to stare the jaws of death (so to speak) in the
mouth. Is this a martyr complex of sorts? Does it give
SPers confidence if they are persecuted for the Lord's sake ? I
suppose an argument can be made that if one dies while in the service
of the Lord, it would be a feather in the cap of the persecuted while
at the same time driving the persecutor even deeper into hell.
To me that seems like rather odd logic, considering that the SPer (or
guy showing up on the doorstep) is somewhat a catalyst in this
scenario. IOW....Is a SPer guilty of promoting a problem when he
uses his constitutionally guaranteed free speech to aggravate a
situation that can and will likely turn to
violence?
Dean Moore wrote:
Moderator: Wouldn't have to show up in
Portland DaveH-all I would have to do is click a button and my
problem is solved and that is exactly what I going to do the next
time you use the words-****************** in the combination that
you used them below. Discussion over-warning given!
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
3/5/2006 12:52:41 PM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of truthtalk?
DAVEH: Dean, from what
you said previously about the oneness of husband and wife, if I
were to ask you about ************,, you would take that as
a personal attack on ****** and would then presume it to be a
personal attack on you as well, and then proceed to come to
Portland and show up on my doorstep.....is that correct?
Wouldn't it be smarter just to say the same thing to me via email
or a phone call, rather than show up on my doorstep? What
would be accomplished by coming to Portland?
If I were then to assume you are on my
doorstep for a reason other than an amicable discussion, and felt
my life was being threatened by your presence on my doorstep, I
would probably not answer the door. Wouldn't that just
frustrate your reason for going to all that effort, cost, time and
travel in an effort to come to my doorstep? Would you
proceed to pound on my doo r expecting me to open it? If I
did not respond to your pounding, then what would you do?
And if you continued to pound on my door, what would you do if I
opened it with a gun in my hand, as I might do if I perceived you
as being a threat to me in my home?
At that point, if you turned and left,
nothing else would happen and you would have spent a lot of effort
for little reason other than to satisfy your pride. If on
the other hand you were to raise the level of confrontation by
arguing, and if I misunderstood the reasons you were on my
doorstep confronting me and refusing to leave, would you be
surprised if it led to a lethal action on my
part?
IF that above scenario were to
occur, how do you think the law would view this matter?
Would I be found guilty of manslaughter, or would you be guilty of
threatening my life to the point of my using justifiable lethal
means in self-defense? In my defense, I'm sure my lawyer
would quote your comment.....
....
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
|
