RE: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?

Thu, 09 Mar 2006 05:49:29 -0800

No it is the ACT
Things such as Love are the evidence/emblem
 
Can one see your baptism into the death of Christ?
That is a spiritual act performed by God
One can however see the EVIDENCE of your Love.


ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is one evidence.  Not the only evidence, certainly.  iz
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
 
Wow!, a voice of clarity amidst ...who knows what? Thanks. However Iz, my question actually was 'Is speaking in tongues THE evidence of having been baptized in/with the Spirit'? In some circles this is Pentecostal doctrine and, must be signed off on (?) by all pastors. 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 08, 2006 17:13
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
 
Yes, I think the snake handlers are testing God and are out of line.  I don’t understand what you want to know about speaking in tongues.  Do I? Yes.  Do I think those who don’t aren’t saved? No.  Any other question? Iz
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 4:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
 
I don't mind funnin' even at my expense. Why would I as I've done so often, often myself. However, shall I ask of you, Iz, whether you believe the Appalachian snake handlers to be testing God or, obeying His Word?
 
I note that upon raising an actual matter (HS & tongues) everyone fled to the hills. We all know that none of you has access, through the Word of God, to THE understanding on ALL issues. Does anyone of you brash souls wish to differ on this point? As our beloved moderator has said ...Hmmmmm...what has he actually said in the last 24 hours consistent with a week ago? 
 
Any takers? 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 07, 2006 20:06
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
 
I guess Paul went overboard, too, when he shook that snake off his hand and didn’t get sick.  Such a literal guy. iz
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 5:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
 
That was an reference to the 'Appalachian snake handlers'. Thus, those who've gone a touch overboard on literalism. Look in the mirror folks.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to