Re: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?

Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:15:57 -0800

Truth is not a shell game unless one is a Spiritual Huckster then it can be a tool for fooling the masses
There are plenty of them out there!
"Jesus Christ was not begotten by the Holy Ghost....' if the Son was begotten by the Holy Ghost, it would be very dangerous to baptize and confirm females, and give the Holy Ghost to them, lest he should beget children to be palmed upon the elders by the people, bringing the elders into great difficulties.'" - Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, v.1, p.51

Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sooooooooooooo who has the truth?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 09, 2006 08:49
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?

SO
 
 


Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Pentecostal pastors/seminary teachers I speak with differ over this.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 09, 2006 08:43
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?

It is one evidence.  Not the only evidence, certainly.  iz
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
 
Wow!, a voice of clarity amidst ...who knows what? Thanks. However Iz, my question actually was 'Is speaking in tongues THE evidence of having been baptized in/with the Spirit'? In some circles this is Pentecostal doctrine and, must be signed off on (?) by all pastors. 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 08, 2006 17:13
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
 
Yes, I think the snake handlers are testing God and are out of line.  I don’t understand what you want to know about speaking in tongues.  Do I? Yes.  Do I think those who don’t aren’t saved? No.  Any other question? Iz
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 4:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
 
I don't mind funnin' even at my expense. Why would I as I've done so often, often myself. However, shall I ask of you, Iz, whether you believe the Appalachian snake handlers to be testing God or, obeying His Word?
 
I note that upon raising an actual matter (HS & tongues) everyone fled to the hills. We all know that none of you has access, through the Word of God, to THE understanding on ALL issues. Does anyone of you brash souls wish to differ on this point? As our beloved moderator has said ...Hmmmmm...what has he actually said in the last 24 hours consistent with a week ago? 
 
Any takers? 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 07, 2006 20:06
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
 
I guess Paul went overboard, too, when he shook that snake off his hand and didn’t get sick.  Such a literal guy. iz
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 5:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes anyone'?
 
That was an reference to the 'Appalachian snake handlers'. Thus, those who've gone a touch overboard on literalism. Look in the mirror folks.

Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to