-----
Sent: March 23, 2006
17:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
Is KD a pseudonym for Gary North?
"if ever a
continent of covenant-breakers deserved this
attribution (extermination), the "native Americans" did."
Pope Gary North (comments added)
Pope Gary North "The long-term goal of Christians in politics
should be to gain exclusive control over the franchise.
Those who refuse to submit...must be denied
citizenship".
Reformed Baptist? LOL
Baptist Reconstruction? LOL
Baptist Kingdom builders? LOL
Baptist DominionISM? LOL
Baptist Pope ROTFL
RC Pope Calvin
Reformed Presbyterian
Bring in the kingdom Presbytery & JD
Replacement Theology "We are Jews" Presbytery,
Romans, Reformed C's, Mormons, Reformed, JD &
Lance!
Apparently you are TOTALLY IGNORANT of Baptists
see # 4 The priesthood of the believer & #5 right of soul
liberty or religious liberty
# 7 The Separation of Church and State
Try to get your baseless assertions straight:
Gary North Reformed Catholic - Presbytery
RJ Rushdoony Reformed Catholic - Presbytery
Gary Demar -Reformed Catholic - presbytery
Kindy garten 101 - Who is who?
PROTESTant RC Zwingly - Holding Bible &
SWORD
For all you kiddies TEST QUESTION who has
the sword?
Even some Presbyterian RC's admit they are just
RC
Dominion is the Sole Realm of Popes,
Protestants & Potentates!!!
Again all the ammo you have is Psycho assertionISM!
Name smearing and grossly misrepresenting peoples
beliefs.
These REFORMED Catholics are just like their Papa
Baptists do not preach this baloney never have.
Popes Protestants and Potentates have blood on their
hands.
Most times it was the blood of Baptists
You defame their pure blood, shed by murderous RC's
Antipas was my faithful martyr,
who was slain among you
RJ Rushdooney
The Royal Race of the
Redeemed?
Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is KD a pseudonym for Gary North?
Have you finally come out of hiding after the Y2K fiasco? I do
believe that were we to remove the hoods from some on TT we
would see that which underlies the hatred that you spread
throughout the mid-east and, elsewhere.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 23, 2006
07:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Fw: Williams on Creationism
AGAIN you show your Short Comprehension
I am NOT a REFORMED CATHOLIC.
wrong slot Lance, better take it to your friends for a
consensus
What do you know of RJR?
Not as much as you think, I suppose.
He is NOT a Fundamentalist
Like Papa like son, bring out the stake....
Spoken like a true studen of
RJR.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 22, 2006
21:05
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Let's have them Teach Dominion Theology in
school ; )
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm talking about fundy creationist versions in the
school systems and you are talking about religious
people!!! Amazing
Maybe we should install a different creationist
version for every major school system
.................... I am sure we can find
enough fundy ideas to go around. That way , you
would have to worry about consensus and no one will
have the slightest idea what to believe. but you
and Kev will be happy. CONSENSUS BE
DAMNED. KNOW THE TRUTH AND IT SHALL MAKE YOU
FREE !!
jd
--------------
Original message --------------
From: Judy Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I surmised as much JD; my
point being that religious ppl have many
and varied points of view
about anything and everything and this is
no
measure by which to gauge
what is needful or true.
Do you even know what this thread is about,
Judy?
WHICH VIEW OF CREATIONISM GETS INTO THE
CIRRICULUM -- HUH ???
From:
Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So?
There isn't a single view
of the whole church that is agreed
upon
by the whole church
either. What does that prove?
judyt
Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I
do. I know this --
there isn't a single view of creationism
that is agreed upon by the whole
church.
jd
--------------
Original message --------------
From: "David
Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John wrote:
> The world in which we live would
reject
> any mention of God in the evolutionary
process,
> IMO. But creationism
in the schools? Could
> that not be considered the beginnings
of a fanatical
> fundamentalist take-over of the
culture?
ROTFLOL. I sure hope you were
being facetious on purpose.
John wrote:
> But to allow a mere statement
that suggests God
> is somehow in control as the
Creator(?) If this
> could be presented into the secular
system of
> education without it being coopted by
the fundies
> -- go for it. But I
doubt that it can. What a shame
> that radical fundamentalism within
Christiandom forces
> the Body to dismiss a perfectly
wonderful opportunity
> to introduce the Creator to
others.
In case you did not notice, the
fundamentalists are not causing the
acknowledgement of our Creator to be forbidden
in schools. It is the liberal loonies
like this Archbishop of Canterbury who are
doing this.
David Miller
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make
PC-to-Phone
Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with
Voice.