|
Sure is ... the last thing I would label any of the
ones named is a Dominion
Theologist. Sometimes I wonder about their
definition of "fundamentalist"
and if to be fair they should write a new
dictionary for those who are out of
THEIR loop?
ShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Funny how some guys take a false assumption to the extreme, hey > Judy? iz > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Judy > > Just one more example which proves the fact that you have not ever > > understood what any of us > > > > have been saying. Not really. I know I am not into Dominion > > Theology and I > > don't hear it coming from > > > > Iz, Kevin, or David either. So you are out there Lance, possibly > in > > the > > next orbit to Gary. > > > > > > > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:59:22 -0500 "Lance Muir" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > writes: > > > > You certainly have! (see Iz, Judy, Kevin & David) Stage direction: > > The word > > 'certainly' should be spoken so as to provide the same > emphasis/tone > > that > > 'Ollie' had when saying 'here's another fine mess you've gotten me > > into, > > Stanley...' > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To: [email protected] ; [email protected] > > > > Sent: March 24, 2006 09:48 > > > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion > > > > > > > > I have never heard of Gary North, but I see his theology in much > that > > has > > been written on TT. > > > > > > > > jd > > > > > > > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Funny, I would've thought that you and Gary would be best buds. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Kevin <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Deegan > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Sent: March 24, 2006 07:04 > > > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Zwingli_statue.jpg> Statue of > > Zwingli > > in Zürich > > > > > > > > Bible N Sword! > > > > > > > > Here are some interesting quotes from Calvinist Gary North > (Reformed > > Catholic Taliban) > > > > This is what happens when one thinks they are a Jew, they actually > > have > > joined themselves to the synogogue of Satan. > > > > > > > > "The fifth and by far the most important reason is that stoning is > > literally > > a means of crushing the murderer's head by means of a rock > literally > > a means > > of crushing the murderer's head by means of a rock, which is > symbolic > > of > > God. This is analogous to the crushing of the head of the serpent > in > > Genesis > > 3:15. This symbolism testifies to the final victory of God over > all > > the > > hosts of Satan. Stoning is therefore integral to the commandment > > against > > murder. Gary North > > > > > > > > The question eventually must be raised: Is it a criminal offense > to > > take > > the name of the Lord in vain? When people curse their parents, it > > unquestionably is a capital crime (Ex. 21:17). The son or daughter > is > > under > > the lawful jurisdiction of the family. The integrity of the family > > must be > > maintained by the threat of death. Clearly, cursing God > (blasphemy) > > is a > > comparable crime, and is therefore a capital crime (Lev. 24:16). > Gary > > New > > Geneva North > > > > > > > > The long-term goal of Christians in politics should be to gain > > exclusive > > control over the franchise. Those who refuse to submit publicly to > > the > > eternal sanctions of God by submitting to His Church's public > marks > > of the > > covenant - baptism and holy communion - must be denied > citizenship, > > just as > > they were in ancient Israel. Gary (death to NON Paedobaptists) > North > > written from New Geneva > > > > > > > > Nevertheless, this one fact should be apparent: turning the other > > cheek is > > a bribe. It is a valid form of action for only so long as the > > Christian is > > impotent politically or militarily. Gary North > > > > Satan cannot win. Why not? Because he has denied God's sovereignty > > and > > disobeyed God's law. But Moses was told explicitly, God's > blessings > > come > > only from obedience. Satan will not win because he has abandoned > > God's tool > > of dominion, biblical law. Gary North (sounds CALVINistic to me) > > > > There is only one Bride; God is not a bigamist. He took no gentile > > wife > > under the Old Covenant, and He will not accept a pale imitation of > > Old > > Covenant Israel - modern Judaism - as His wife in the future. Gary > > "we are > > the replacement" North > > > > > > > > What the ten commandments set forth is a strategy. This strategy > is a > > strategy for dominion. Gary (enforce the law with the sword) North > > > > > > > > " Jesus was not denying the legitimacy of biblical law. On the > > contrary, He > > was affirming biblical law. We love God first; God commands us to > > keep His > > word; therefore, we must enforce the law on ourselves. Gary North > > > > The battle for the mind, some fundamentalists believe, is between > > fundamentalism and the institutions of the Left. This conception > of > > the > > battle is fundamentally incorrect. The battle for the mind is > between > > the > > Christian reconstruction movement, which alone among Protestant > > groups takes > > seriously the law of God, and everyone else. > > > > ----- > > > > From: Kevin <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Deegan > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Sent: March 23, 2006 17:52 > > > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism > > > > > > > > Is KD a pseudonym for Gary North? > > > > Gary North king of y2k > > > > > > "if ever a continent of covenant-breakers deserved this > attribution > > (extermination), the "native Americans" did." Pope Gary North > > (comments > > added) > > > > Pope Gary North "The long-term goal of Christians in politics > should > > be to > > gain exclusive control over the franchise. Those who refuse to > > submit...must > > be denied citizenship". > > > > > > > > Reformed Baptist? LOL > > > > Baptist Reconstruction? LOL > > > > Baptist Kingdom builders? LOL > > > > Baptist DominionISM? LOL > > > > Baptist Pope ROTFL > > > > > > > > RC Pope Calvin > > > > Reformed Presbyterian > > > > Bring in the kingdom Presbytery & JD > > > > Replacement Theology "We are Jews" Presbytery, Romans, Reformed > C's, > > Mormons, Reformed, JD & Lance! > > > > > > > > Apparently you are TOTALLY IGNORANT of Baptists > > > > http://www.reformedreader.org/histb.htm > > > > see # 4 The priesthood of the believer & #5 right of soul liberty > or > > religious liberty > > > > # 7 The Separation of Church and State > > > > > > > > Try to get your baseless assertions straight: > > > > Gary North Reformed Catholic - Presbytery > > > > RJ Rushdoony Reformed Catholic - Presbytery > > > > Gary Demar -Reformed Catholic - presbytery > > > > > > > > Kindy garten 101 - Who is who? > > > > Baptist Roger Williams Holding a Bible > > http://www.zbt.org/traditions/Roger_Williams_photo.htm > > > > > > > > PROTESTant RC Zwingly - Holding Bible & SWORD > > > > http://www.antipas.org/books/protesters/prot_images/zwingli.jpg > > > > > > > > For all you kiddies TEST QUESTION who has the sword? > > > > > > > > Even some Presbyterian RC's admit they are just RC > > > > http://reformedcatholicism.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > Dominion is the Sole Realm of Popes, Protestants & Potentates!!! > > > > > > > > Again all the ammo you have is Psycho assertionISM! > > > > Name smearing and grossly misrepresenting peoples beliefs. > > > > These REFORMED Catholics are just like their Papa > > > > Baptists do not preach this baloney never have. > > > > Popes Protestants and Potentates have blood on their hands. > > > > Most times it was the blood of Baptists > > > > You defame their pure blood, shed by murderous RC's > > > > Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you > > > > > > > > > > > > RJ Rushdooney > > > > http://www.sullivan-county.com/nf0/fundienazis/royal_race.htm > > > > The Royal Race of the Redeemed? > > > > > > > > Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is KD a pseudonym for Gary North? Have you finally come out of > hiding > > after > > the Y2K fiasco? I do believe that were we to remove the hoods from > > some on > > TT we would see that which underlies the hatred that you spread > > throughout > > the mid-east and, elsewhere. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Kevin <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Deegan > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Sent: March 23, 2006 07:50 > > > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism > > > > > > > > AGAIN you show your Short Comprehension > > > > I am NOT a REFORMED CATHOLIC. > > > > wrong slot Lance, better take it to your friends for a consensus > > > > > > > > What do you know of RJR? > > > > Not as much as you think, I suppose. > > > > He is NOT a Fundamentalist > > > > Like Papa like son, bring out the stake.... > > > > > > > > Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Spoken like a true studen of RJR. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Kevin <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Deegan > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Sent: March 22, 2006 21:05 > > > > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism > > > > > > > > Let's have them Teach Dominion Theology in school ; ) > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I'm talking about fundy creationist versions in the school systems > > and you > > are talking about religious people!!! Amazing > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe we should install a different creationist version for every > > major > > school system .................... I am sure we can find > enough > > fundy > > ideas to go around. That way , you would have to worry about > > consensus and > > no one will have the slightest idea what to believe. but you and > Kev > > will > > be happy. CONSENSUS BE DAMNED. KNOW THE TRUTH AND IT SHALL MAKE > > YOU FREE > > !! > > > > > > > > jd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I surmised as much JD; my point being that religious ppl have many > > > > and varied points of view about anything and everything and this > is > > no > > > > measure by which to gauge what is needful or true. > > > > > > > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:20:02 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Do you even know what this thread is about, Judy? > > > > WHICH VIEW OF CREATIONISM GETS INTO THE CIRRICULUM -- HUH ??? > > > > > > > > > > From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > So? > > > > There isn't a single view of the whole church that is agreed upon > > > > by the whole church either. What does that prove? judyt > > > > > > > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:27:56 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I do. I know this -- > > > > there isn't a single view of creationism that is agreed upon by > the > > whole > > church. > > > > > > > > jd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > John wrote: > > > > > The world in which we live would reject > > > > > any mention of God in the evolutionary process, > > > > > IMO. But creationism in the schools? Could > > > > > that not be considered the beginnings of a fanatical > > > > > fundamentalist take-over of the culture? > > > > ROTFLOL. I sure hope you were being facetious on purpose. > > > > > > > > John wrote: > > > > > But to allow a mere statement that suggests God > > > > > is somehow in control as the Creator(?) If this > > > > > could be presented into the secular system of > > > > > education without it being coopted by the fundies > > > > > -- go for it. But I doubt that it can. What a shame > > > > > that radical fundamentalism within Christiandom forces > > > > > the Body to dismiss a perfectly wonderful opportunity > > > > > to introduce the Creator to others. > > > > In case you did not notice, the fundamentalists are not causing > the > > acknowledgement of our Creator to be forbidden in schools. It is > the > > liberal loonies like this Archbishop of Canterbury who are doing > > this. > > > > > > > > David Miller > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > Yahoo! > > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman3/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt > > =39666/*http:/beta.messenger.yahoo.com> Messenger with Voice. > > PC-to-Phone > > calls for ridiculously low rates. > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone > > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt > > =39663/*http:/voice.yahoo.com> Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with > > Voice. > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make > > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman1/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt > > =39663/*http:/voice.yahoo.com> PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and > 30+ > > countries) for 2¢/min or less. > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call > > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman5/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt > > =39666/*http:/beta.messenger.yahoo.com> regular phones from your > PC > > and > > save big. > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone > > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman2/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt > > =39663/*http:/voice.yahoo.com> Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with > > Voice. > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com |
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion Judy Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Dominion Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Dominion Judy Taylor

