2014-07-09 11:21 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > On 09 Jul 11:14, Jesús Martín Jiménez wrote: > > 2014-07-09 10:45 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > > > > > On 09 Jul 10:25, Jesús Martín Jiménez wrote: > > > > Anyway, this is not the topic of this thread, and finally I found the > > > > solution for the issue so, for the record, there weren't any > dependency > > > > between both modules, so I had to add an extra depends in one of the > > > views. > > > > > > If you talk about > > > > > > > https://bitbucket.org/zikzakmedia/trytond-sale_margin/commits/a85edbe77cde8e99d2e60f28fd5337d80c5ff699 > > > > > > > Yes, I'm talking about it and [1] > > > > > > > this is wrong, you must not add depends on fields that the method > doesn't > > > depend on. > > > > > > > But, I've not added the depends on the method, but on the view [2] > > And what is: > > https://bitbucket.org/zikzakmedia/trytond-sale_margin/commits/a85edbe77cde8e99d2e60f28fd5337d80c5ff699#Lsale.pyT69 >
It was a refactored of the code, adding all existing dependences on an inherited method. -- Jesús Martín Zikzakmedia SL Dr. Fleming, 28, baixos 08720 Vilafranca del Penedès ☏ 93 890 21 08
