Hi,

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Andres Vargas - zodman <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Sharoon Thomas <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello Everybody,
>>
>> First of all, I would like to update you about my Europython
>> presentation.
>>
>> The presentation went well and I am sure has generated some interest in
>> the project and hopefully we get more contributors in the project. The
>> presentation and module itself can be downloaded from
>>
>> http://downloads.tryton.org/europython2010/training.tgz
>> and
>> http://openlabs.co.uk/ep2010/tryton.html
>> (@cedk, could you please fix the 403 on the presentation.zip so that
>> anybody who wants to reuse the presentation could use it)
>>
>
> Excelent!!!!
>
> ¿Exist a video record for part of oscon ?
>
There is no recording i believe, I did not see any.

>
>
>> Now, back to the issue at hand:
>>
>> Tryton code (IMHO) is mature enough for us to start thinking of
>> performance improvements. As discussed with Cedrik, I request all of you to
>> propose or update tickets with the file and line number(s) of code where you
>> think there is a performance issue. This collection could later be discussed
>> and optimised.
>>
>> @cedk, could you recommend if we should start thinking of patches/diff
>> also, or just collect the points where we think the issues exist.
>>
>> Issue for Python optimisation: https://bugs.tryton.org/roundup/issue1627
>>  <https://bugs.tryton.org/roundup/issue1627>Issue for SQL optimisation:
>> https://bugs.tryton.org/roundup/issue1628
>>
>> It could be great if you could also mention why you think there is a
>> performance issue, and what the solution would be
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> *Sharoon Thomas*
>> *Business Analyst & ERP Consultant*
>>
>> *INNOVATING BUSINESS SOLUTIONS*
>> *
>> *
>>
>>  --
>> [email protected] mailing list
>
>
>
>
> --
> Andres Vargas
> www.zodman.com.mx
>
>  --
> [email protected] mailing list
>


Thanks for the nice words.

@cedk, @Mathias:
'Such issue can only serve to collect links to other issues. Is this
intended? So
far we use roundup in an 'atomic' way, i.e. one issue per entry. Collecting
several issues under one issue contradicts the workflow of roundup.'

I agree and as cedk mentioned let us use supersede functionality.

Thanks
-- 
Sharoon Thomas
Business Analyst & Open Source ERP Consultant
CEO @ http://openlabs.co.in

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to