On 29/04/12 20:45 +0200, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > A Diumenge, 29 d'abril de 2012 20:17:25, Cédric Krier va escriure: > > > Also the fact that some get functions of fields.Function use @classmethod > > > and others use "standard" functions makes it a bit more complex. Could > > > we standarize and always use the same mechanism? > > > > Indeed the simplier is the instance method but that is not always the > > best because it could be better to work on list like when you can do a > > SQL query to compute all at once. > > Yes, I saw that, but maybe it is simpler to make all functions behave the > same > way (that is the version that can be optimized). Maybe I need to get used to > it, but it seems that it's harder to read the code if each function follows a > different scheme. Maybe it's better to always consider you're getting the > list > of models and that's it.
I don't agree. It is because you can use the right kind of method that makes the code easier to read. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgphBIvcSUQk7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
