A Dijous, 8 de novembre de 2012 20:26:02, Jordi Esteve va escriure:
> Àngel Àlvarez Serra wrote:
> > 2012/11/8 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>:
> >> On 08/11/12 17:28 +0100, Raimon Esteve wrote:
> >>>> No, but I don't think it is needed (personaly I never used it)
> >>> 
> >>> When a customer need to report some record and this record isn't a
> >>> number sequence (not reference), how to find this record? by ID
> >> 
> >> I think it is a design issue if the only way to make reference to a
> >> record is by the technical id. Normally, the rec_name should be good
> >> enough (but sometimes some more information is required).
> > 
> > On Mail or Phone support,   ID  helps us  to find the correct record,
> > sometimes it's dificult to find records only by references, because
> > products had extra large names and only last 2 chars differs  or
> > simply find correct stock move.
> 
> Yes, Àngel has explained very well one of the reasons to access records
> by id: ID helps us to find the correct record, sometimes it's difficult
> to find records only by references or names.
> 
> I agree with Raimon and Ángel that if the Goto feature is removed, ID
> could be added in search toolbar (filter) to find a record by ID. I
> don't think that the users could be confused by adding always the ID
> field in search toolbar.

+1

In Koo that "advanced search" is available only if the user clicks on a button 
so non-advanced users do not get confused by this feature. In our experience 
it's even necessary in many scenarious. Many of our customers make extensive 
use of Koo's advanced search which not only lets them search by any field of 
the current model but also one level beyond on many2one fields. That has 
avoided numerous developments to our customers.

Even going some steps futher given tryton's improved dot notation would be 
great. Just today a customer needed execute an action on production lots of 
all products that were in the categories that had a flag we added to them. They 
couldn't do it but it would have been very useful for them. That doesn't 
happen every day but similar things happen very frequently. The thing is how 
shoud that interface look like or if that column should be automatically added 
so it is more intuitive for user or something like that.

-- 
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Tel: +34 93 553 18 03

http://twitter.com/albertnan 
http://www.nan-tic.com/blog

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to