On 02/10/13 06:46 -0700, Axel Braun wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2013 18:39:08 UTC+2 schrieb Cédric Krier: > > > > > > > > URL: http://codereview.tryton.org/1110002/ > > > > > > > My concern is that it is a personal package and not an official openSUSE > > (if I understand correctly). I would prefer (as I don't have any > > knowledge in openSUSE package) that we link only packages managed by the > > official workflow of the distribution. > > > > The build service offers users the ability to build packages for various > platforms (Fedora, Red Hat, Cent OS, Ubuntu, Debian,..) from a single > source. openSUSE as distribution bases completely on packages from the > build service.
We are not really concern, packages already exist for Fedora (and I guess derivates), Ubuntu and Debian > For sure we could try to push this into a standard repository (e.g. > /repositories/server:/ERP, to be created). But in the end of the day, it > needs a maintainer. Of course, to garantee that guidelines of the distrubution are followed. > So you can volunteer, I have no interesse in there. > or I can continue doing this. it > would not be pushed into a standard repo without having a maintainer. In my > personal area, it gives me more flexibility, e.g. to add python repos that > are required for building. Yes that is my concern. If there is a maintainer behind the package than we can encourage people to use it otherwise we just give unverifiable advise. > More important for me is that there is a build for openSUSE, which makes it > easy to install Tryton from RPM, with the standard tools (like zypper). I think this goal doesn't reach the global Tryton goal. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpwRqMFYUvMC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
