On 02/10/13 19:50 +0200, Guillem Barba Domingo wrote: > El 02/10/2013 16:05, "Cédric Krier" <[email protected]> va escriure: > > > > On 02/10/13 06:46 -0700, Axel Braun wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2013 18:39:08 UTC+2 schrieb Cédric Krier: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > URL: http://codereview.tryton.org/1110002/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > My concern is that it is a personal package and not an official > openSUSE > > > > (if I understand correctly). I would prefer (as I don't have any > > > > knowledge in openSUSE package) that we link only packages managed by > the > > > > official workflow of the distribution. > > > > > > > > The build service offers users the ability to build packages for > various > > > platforms (Fedora, Red Hat, Cent OS, Ubuntu, Debian,..) from a single > > > source. openSUSE as distribution bases completely on packages from the > > > build service. > > > > We are not really concern, packages already exist for Fedora (and I > > guess derivates), Ubuntu and Debian > > I think it's good to have packages of Tryton, specially it they are updated. > The webpage could have two lists of packages: officials and personals, and > each one with the list of available versions.
Personals packages are against all the rules of good practice. Moreover, *I don't want to manage such volatile list*. > Cedk, you talk about the official workflow of distribution, but sometimes > it's bad. Not bad but doesn't match your need. So it is this just mean that the distribution is not for you. > For example, in Debian the packages are for a very old version of > Tryton, so Debian and Ubuntu users will prefere a PPA with the latests > stable versions. > It is a very common situation for many products. Everyone is free but we don't have the ability to evaluate the quality of packages. So we delegate to the distributions. > In summary, I think that more packages (and all of them listed in Tryton's > website) and more explicit information (officials/personal) is better for > users. No, "more" is not often better. Having such structure will make things much more complicate for the visitor. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpITIGpZq51P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
