On 19 Nov 11:02, LAG Robin Baumgartner wrote:
> On 19.11.2014 11:27, Cédric Krier wrote:
> > On 19 Nov 09:48, LAG Robin Baumgartner wrote:
> >> On 18.11.2014 22:39, Cédric Krier wrote:
> >>> If we apply this patch the contribution guide could be reduced for
> >>> simple fix to:
> >>>
> >>>     $ hg clone http://hg.tryton.org/trytond
> >>>     $ cd trytond; vi …
> >>>     $ curl -o ~/.local/bin/upload.py 
> >>> http://codereview.tryton.org/static/upload.py
> >>>     $ python ~/.local/bin/upload.py
> >>
> >> I don't quite see the benefit for the contributor, that looks exactly
> >> like the current workflow for creating a code review.
> > 
> > He doesn't need any more to:
> > 
> >     - commit the changeset
> >     - export the changeset into a patch
> >     - attach the patch to an issue
> > 
> > After some talks with people complaining about the current workflow, it
> > was this part that was the most difficult for them when doing a small
> > contribution.
> 
> So this would be a shortened workflow for issues not worth a bug report,
> right?

Yes.
But I plan also to improve the workflow for issue with bug report by
making rietveld add register the review to the issue automaticaly.

-- 
Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
Email/Jabber: [email protected]
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

Attachment: pgp9RD1g5F9Z0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to