On 20 Nov 23:21, Raimon Esteve wrote: > Hie > > I read about move git + github. It's the solution? I think, not. > > For example TrytonSpain users (l10n from Spain) are working with hg + > bitbucket (1). We started with hgreview but now we are working with issues > and pull request in bitbucket (and a lot messages in mailing list!) > > I think to faster contribution is about user roles.
Why will we want faster contribution? What will be the value added? Why wanting to kill the current workflow which proved to generate good quality? > In my experience, Céd > is who aprobe features, reviews and patch in default branch. Only a person. > Maybe more users to do those tasks is more faster. (and I'm not a > candidate!). For sure, it will be better if more people were doing the review task. But most of the contributors only care about their issues. Any tools will not change this, it is the contributors that must change their minds. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpfGtgFBW7Qm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
