On 2015-07-04 10:49, Jordi Esteve wrote: > On 04/07/15 08:58, Cédric Krier wrote: > >Hi, > > > >For now, we put a blue color on entries when they are required (and > >switch to red when validated as empty). > >I think it is a bad practice for 2 reasons: > > > > - the colors are not custumizable and so they could not work on some > > thèmes. > > > > - it is doesn't help the accessibility [1] as this information is > > only based on color. > > > >So I was thinking instead about adding a "*" on the labels of the > >required fields. This still stay quite visual (but not too much) and > >readable for accessibility. > > > >What do you think? Has anyone a better idea? > > > > I suggest to not remove the current behaviour. The blue color and switching > to red if the field is not filled is intuitive and clear for most people, > the asterisk is not intuitive (needs a previous explanation), so I suggest > adding a "*" without removing current behaviour.
This will not fix the first point about theme. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
