El 12/02/18 a les 10:30, Cédric Krier ha escrit: > On 2018-02-12 10:03, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: >>> If we want to use this feature, yes the fs_values must reflect the sum >>> of what was written by the module. >> I'm not sure if it's worth to implement it. Let me explain: Currently we >> are forced to update a record definition of the same module because the >> new kind is not defined on the same module but on another one. The >> problem is that account_es doest not depend on account_deposit and we >> don't want to add the dependency. Normally this is fixed by adding the >> code on a third module that depends on both modules. > I think there are use cases where it will be useful just like the > "depends" attribute on record because it increases the modularity. > Indeed I think we could extend the "depends" to the "field" tag and have > something like this: > > <record> > <field name="kind">other</field> > <field name="kind" depends="account_deposit">deposit</field> > </record> > > The parser should use the latest value matching the condition. > Ok I see your point and I agree that this will improve the modularity of the system. JFR, I've created an issue to implement it:
https://bugs.tryton.org/issue7127 And also updated the spanish chart of accounts to use it: https://bugs.tryton.org/issue7126 -- Sergi Almacellas Abellana www.koolpi.com Twitter: @pokoli_srk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton-dev" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton-dev/68d2761c-9b99-0f78-d65b-2dc493dc86bc%40koolpi.com.
