Le Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:18:51 +0200,
Cédric Krier <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Here is the proposal for vote on improving contribution requirements
> that will take place from 27-06-2010 to 03-07-2010.
> 
> Definitions:
> 
> - contribution: any code or xml data submit for commit into a
> repository of Tryton.
> - contributor name: the name of the contributor in the patch
> - contributor email: the email address set by the contributor in the
> patch
> - key words: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
> 
> 
> Proposals for vote: 
> - The contributor name must be the real name of the natural person
> who submit the code
> 
> - The contributor email must be a valid email address
> 
> - The contributor email must be unique
> 
> - The domain of contributor email must not contain tryton
> 
> - The username of the mercurial patch must be in the form:
> 
>     Name <email>


Some precision on how I see stuffs : Those 'must' rules are enforced
for each changeset of the repositories, so they can be expressed as
'should' rules for patch submissions. More practically: If a patch
(submitted to the bugtracker) does not observe one of the previous
points it may happens one of the following:

- The patch is simply ignored,
- The patch is rewritten from scratch,
- The contributor name is replaced and the patch is applied (in the
  case of a trivial patch, there is no original work and no way of
  rewriting it)


Which means that the rules are enforced for each patch that reach the
repositories.

> Discussion on this proposals and definitions is openned and will end
> at Jun 27 18:00:00 CEST 2010 [1].
> 
> [1]
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=27&month=6&year=2010&hour=18&min=0&sec=0&p1=48
> 

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to