Le Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:22:52 +0200, Mathias Behrle <[email protected]> a écrit :
> * Betr.: " Re: [tryton] Voting proposal" (Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:04:18 > +0200): > > > Le Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:18:51 +0200, > > Cédric Krier <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > Here is the proposal for vote on improving contribution > > > requirements that will take place from 27-06-2010 to 03-07-2010. > > > [...] > > > > Some precision on how I see stuffs : Those 'must' rules are enforced > > for each changeset of the repositories, so they can be expressed as > > 'should' rules for patch submissions. > > [...] > I don't understand this paragraph. 'Should' rules change to 'Must' > rules on commit time? Then they are indeed 'Must' rules... Let me re-phrase my proposition: 1) To be applied on a repository, a changeset MUST contains the name of a real person and a valid and unique email address. 2) Hence a submission of changeset on the bugtracker SHOULD contains the name of a real person and a valid and unique email address. If the submission doesn't observe this constraint, and in order to ensure point 1), it MAY happen one of the following: The patch is simply ignored or the patch is rewritten from scratch or he contributor name is replaced and the patch is applied. > > > > Which means that the rules are enforced for each patch that reach > > the repositories. > > Is this a proposal to discuss or is it a definition, while you are > speaking here in your functionality as maintainer? > This is a proposal, with more details on what happens if a submission on the bugtracker is invalid, more precise and IMO better than the previous one. As such everybody is welcome to vote for it or against it once the voting window opens. And of course everybody is welcome to give a new proposal or to suggest a variation of this one. Bertrand -- [email protected] mailing list
