On 12/05/11 18:29 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > >What I want to say is that it is a feature not very important and > > >compared to the time it will take to implement/test, there is really > > >a lot of other stuffs to do. > > > > Maybe it is not the most important, but there is a small conceptual > > problem there. > > Whether small or not, I think it is important;).
We talk here about the split of required and nonzero, not about the zero unit price issue. > JFTR: we had to eliminate the > 'required' on unit_price already long time ago, because for us (in Germany) > there are many use cases for invoice lines with amount 0. It would have been good to talk about this at this time. I have create the issue2022 [1] for this. > I like very much the idea to have 'required' and 'nonzero'. I think we all agree that it will be good but not absolutly required. So patch is welcome :-) [1] https://bugs.tryton.org/roundup/issue2022 -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpc4A5P4LaI9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
