On 06/11/11 18:26 +0100, Dr. Axel Braun wrote: > Am Sonntag, 6. November 2011 schrieb Cédric Krier: > > > > > > >> It doesn't sound correct: supply method available > > > > > > > > > > > > > >what about 'in-house'? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Supply method: in-house sounds good. > > > > > > Maybe 'internal' also. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are really talkng about the product availability, dont you? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No. It is about how to supply a sale line. > > > > > > > > > > > > ...and the availability drives this. > > > > No. It is choosen at the sale or by the default value defined on the > > product. > > In case you want a general distinction, e.g. for a material always supplied > by > a third party order, that makes sense. For normal stock or service products > not, IMHO.
I don't understand. If it is not "On Purchase", it is automaticly "On Stock" (current naming). -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpjGqa5hMsUv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
