Am Sonntag, 6. November 2011 schrieb Cédric Krier:
> On 06/11/11 19:33 +0100, Dr. Axel Braun wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 6. November 2011 schrieb Cédric Krier:
> > > On 06/11/11 18:26 +0100, Dr. Axel Braun wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, 6. November 2011 schrieb Cédric Krier:
> > > > > > > > > >> It doesn't sound correct: supply method available
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >what about 'in-house'?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Supply method: in-house sounds good.
> > > > > > > > > Maybe 'internal' also.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > You are really talkng about the product availability, dont
> > > > > > > > you?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > No. It is about how to supply a sale line.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ...and the availability drives this.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No. It is choosen at the sale or by the default value defined on
> > > > > the product.
> > > > 
> > > > In case you want a general distinction, e.g. for a material always
> > > > supplied by a third party order, that makes sense. For normal stock
> > > > or service products not, IMHO.
> > > 
> > > I don't understand. If it is not "On Purchase", it is automaticly "On
> > > Stock" (current naming).
> > 
> > You may want to sell items that you never have on stock - the process is
> > called a third party order ('Streckengeschäft'). The customer orders with
> > you, you send a PO to the supplier, and the supplier sends the goods to
> > the customer, without touching your warehouse.
> > You send an invoice to the customer, and the customer pays you. You pay
> > the supplier.
> 
> Yes and this is the sale_supply_drop_shipment

Different name, same story - fine
 
> > For this process - maybe a certain material - you may want to put a
> > distinction on material level, so that a sales to a customer immediately
> > triggers the PO to the supplier.
> > 
> > If you have a stock item - see earlier in the conversation - you can
> > either deliver from stock, or, if you dont have enough stock, you have
> > to put it on hold as you first have to purchase it ( I assume this is
> > what you mean with 'on purchase')
> 
> No this is not the "On Purchase". The purchase you are talking about
> comes from the order point. So it is still "On Stock".

Then please explain what 'on purchase' shall be....
 

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to