On 26/06/12 13:15 +0100, Fares Hantous wrote: > Le 26/06/2012 13:05, Cédric Krier a écrit : > >On 26/06/12 12:24 +0100, Fares Hantous wrote: > >>Le 26/06/2012 12:00, Cédric Krier a écrit : > >>>On 26/06/12 11:51 +0100, Fares Hantous wrote: > >>>>Le 26/06/2012 11:32, Cédric Krier a écrit : > >>>>>I mean the "Bank Account" Model must contains a list of "Account Number" > >>>>>with a type and the corresponding required fields. > >>>>After reading [1] and [2], it seems that it is possible to do that: > >>>>field1 M2O : country > >>>>field2 : key > >>>>field3 : IID > >>>>field4 : account number > >>>> > >>>>The IBAN is the concatenation : country.code + key + iid + account number > >>>>The RIB / BBAC is the concatenation : iid + account number > >>>> > >>>>This seems to be generic for all countries. > >>>> > >>>>[1] http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_13616 > >>>>[2] http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Bank_Account_Number > >>>I really think that it will be a dead end if you try to be too smart and > >>>too strict when storing such information. > >>>So the account number should be stored in a simple Char field. > >>> > >>Why? > >>This way, the user doesn't need to write twice (or 3 times) the > >>account number. > >>If you need the account number or the RIB or the IBAN, you get it. > >Because you are just speaking about a specific cases and not about > >general purpose. > > > Which case is not solved this way ?
Any case where RIB or IBAN is not involved. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgplQ6SS6qPrm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
