On 13/02/13 17:32 +0100, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Betr.: " [tryton] Credit wizard on supplier invoice/credit note" (Wed, 13 > Feb > 2013 16:56:07 +0100): > > > The codereview [1] which adds two new test scenarii on account_invoice > > has revealed an issue about the credit wizard for supplier > > invoice/credit note. > > In trunk, the supplier invoice/credit note doesn't have anymore a > > invoice_date filled by default because it was decided that the user must > > take care of the *real* invoice date the supplier put on it. With this > > behavior we are sure the user will have to fill it correctly. > > > > But this breaks the credit wizard if used with "refund" option because > > it needs to validate the credited invoice to be able to reconcile it > > with the origin one. But as the invoice_date is not filled, it always > > fails. > > > > So I think having a credit wizard for supplier invoice/credit note > > doesn't have sense because such credited document need to be filled with > > the information received from the supplier (like invoice date). > > So I propose to remove the wizard (or prevent to run it) on supplier > > invoice/credit note. > > > > Any comments? > > If the date shall be set by the user, the correct way for me would be to offer > it in the wizard.
The workflow seems incorrect for me:
- receive credit note from supplier
- find the original invoice
- run credit wizard
- correct differences
vs:
- receive credit note from supplier
- encode it
- (reconcile it later)
--
Cédric Krier
B2CK SPRL
Rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Liège
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Email/Jabber: [email protected]
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpbDdCWler1e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
