> 2013/10/9 LAG Robin Baumgartner <[email protected]>: >> You're not alone with this requirement. In fact, we have already >> developed a very similar module called party_relationship[1]. >> >> Looking at your blueprint, it seems to be very close to our >> implementation. Maybe you want to use that as a base? Improvements are >> welcome of course. > > It is very similar, indeed. The only difference is how we make it > bidirectional. Just one question, what is the use case for the > "asymmetric" option?
It's for asymmetric relationships, such as parent - child, where the relationship is dependent on the direction. For those asymmetrical relationship types there are two relationships created: One with the chosen relationship type and a reverse one with the type specified in the field 'reverse_relationship'.
