On 10/10/13 11:17 +0200, Romain Séon wrote: > 2013/10/10 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>: > > Except that you will quickly start to have duplicate relation kinds. For > > example, a first one: (name: "parent of", reversed: "child of") and a > > second one: (name: "child of", reversed: "parent of"). > > So here it is really better to normalize the schema. > > > The idea is exactly to NOT have two relations kinds to define only one > relation kind. The relation parent/children is one relation, with two > names and not two relations kind with one name
Of course but nothing prevents the user to do it in such design. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email/Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpYB_MJaIeuo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
