Am Sonntag, 13. Oktober 2013, 22:11:13 schrieb Cédric Krier: > On 13/10/13 11:17 +0200, Axel Braun wrote: > > Morning all, > > > > I had a look through the blueprint for the Pro-Forma invoice [1], as it is > > quite important for the import/export and most of he B2C-business (payment > > in advance). > > > > I think in the section 'Accounting' there is a misunderstanding: A > > Pro-Forma invoice is not triggering a financial posting. > > > > At period closing (end of fiscal year), an invoice that belongs to the > > previous year, but has not been paid or received in that period, is > > recognized with an accrual position in AR respectively AP. This *posting* > > is partly referenced as pro-forma-invoice as well. A pro-forma invoice > > may be printed and attached to the documents in order to explain the > > posting. It is reverted in the following year, and the original invoice > > is attached. > > > > In terms of use for Tryton this means that we should create an invoice > > document without subsequent financial posting. This should simplify the > > design. > > > > Comments? > > This has already been discussed > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tryton/G3h9nfKDeQs/discussion > and implemented in > http://hg.tryton.org/modules/account_invoice/rev/15ae4cf806b5
Hm, from the short description in the coding I cant judge if that matches the requirements towards a proforma-invoice. Coming back on Dominique's remark: Yes, it may be different per country. Maybe this can be made customizable, e.g. with a flag that drives whether a financial posting is made or not? > I guess the blueprint should be marked as Implemented or Rejected (don't > know because I don't understand what is proposed in it). Which part is unclear? Cheers/Axel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
