> 1. Invoice address > 2. Delivery address > 3. Consignee > 4. External handler/service as third party
and there are many others, depending on your industry. ## Please give me an example. I do not believe that there is more than that. But give me a chance to follow you on this. > > I explicitly do not see accounting! Accounting cannot group or > consolidate any invoiced sums belonging to one group if the legal > entities have different names or addresses or locations (VAT!!!). This > is the case in IFRS, all European accounting systems, all North > Americans, and Latin Americans. I do not know about the others. I don't think you get the point, but this seems off topic to me. In tryton, accounting is more than this. ## You had mentioned accounting as a reason for using party relationship. I wanted to explain to you, why party relation cannot have anything to do with accounting, as we are not allowed to consolidate anything by that means. It is different in controlling. > > In controlling you can basically do whatever you like, it is > only internal. > indeed, not only controlling, but also extracted data can be used throughout the application and involve relations between parties. Yes. This is my case. Party relationships can only be used in controlling, not accounting. It is important to keep these separate by all means.
