After some discussion with this [1] issue it seems that it's not been clearly stated what the party field in account move lines means. It could be one of:
- it is just a flag that represents the owning (that is, who made that move happen) - it is an easy way to implement sub-account per party. I had always taken for granted that party was used to implement sub-account and hence the issue and the corresponding codereview. What is other people's opinion on this? What's your expected behaviour taking into account the use case described in [1]? Thanks! [1] https://bugs.tryton.org/issue3731 -- Albert Cervera i Areny Tel. 93 553 18 03 @albertnan www.NaN-tic.com
