Hi Nicolas, Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2014, 18:22:32 schrieb Nicolas Évrard: > For the records in trunk we're using as the address for the letter the > default address of the party. This might not be a good idea and we're > planning to use the default address of type 'invoice'.
There may even be more party relations, like 'invoice recipient' or 'payer'. An address type 'invoice' is a good start. > We though about using the invoice address related to the dunning but > it's not a good choice because then payment information will be > misleading. Moreover using an old invoice address (after all we're > talking about an unpaid invoice that might be a year old) might be a > problem also. Not necessarily. You are mixing up master data maintenance and invoice/dunning process. It is a senseful start to send the dunning to the party who received the invoice as well. If the address has changed after a year - feel free to update the master data record. So this approach is OK from my point of view. HTH Axel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
