El 02/04/14 20:40, Axel Braun ha escrit:
Hi Nicolas,
Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2014, 18:22:32 schrieb Nicolas Évrard:
For the records in trunk we're using as the address for the letter the
default address of the party. This might not be a good idea and we're
planning to use the default address of type 'invoice'.
There may even be more party relations, like 'invoice recipient' or 'payer'.
An address type 'invoice' is a good start.
We though about using the invoice address related to the dunning but
it's not a good choice because then payment information will be
misleading. Moreover using an old invoice address (after all we're
talking about an unpaid invoice that might be a year old) might be a
problem also.
Not necessarily. You are mixing up master data maintenance and invoice/dunning
process.
It is a senseful start to send the dunning to the party who received the
invoice as well. If the address has changed after a year - feel free to update
the master data record.
So this approach is OK from my point of view.
Yes, I agree to use the invoice address related to the dunning.
--
Jordi Esteve
Consultor Zikzakmedia SL
[email protected]
Mòbil 679 170 693
Zikzakmedia SL
Dr. Fleming, 28, baixos
08720 Vilafranca del Penedès
Tel 93 890 2108
