Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2014, 15:54:04 schrieb Cédric Krier: > On 03 Jul 15:42, Axel Braun wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2014, 15:16:43 schrieb Cédric Krier: > > > On 03 Jul 14:57, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: > > > > El 03/07/14 13:23, Axel Braun ha escrit: > > > > >>>With what you are saying, a PO is reverted into draft status to > > > > >>>enter > > > > >>>the > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> >quotation price -> how do I know now that a price was really > > > > >>>> >received, or > > > > >>>> >if there is a 'fake' price in it? > > > > >>> > > > > >>>don't understand, can you explain what is a 'fake' price and how > > > > >>>you > > > > >>>can > > > > >>>detect it? > > > > > > > > > >A price that is obviously wrong - we create all new articles with 0€ > > > > >or > > > > >0,01 € just to fulfill the requirement to enter a price > > > > > > > > So if this is obviously wrong the user should detect it. > > > > > > I guess what is missing is to be able to make quotation without unit > > > price and make prices required when going further. > > > > Right. If you send a RFQ to a supplier, you never put a price into the > > RFQ. > > Price is the result the RFQ > > Please don't think your case is the only way. There are plenty cases > where the price is known (or at least an approximation).
I dont disagree with that. But you never approach a Supplier with a price if you want a quote from him..... So, as written above, the handling of this in Tryton could be improved...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
