Hello, In issue 3731 [1] we are discussing about the meaning of the party field on the account move lines.
It seems that the consensus is that this field should be used as some
kind of sub-account categorization. Following this consensus I
implemented the review 14341002 [2].
This review adds on the account definition a boolean to specify if the
account use the party field for sub-accounting.
But while implementing it we realized that all the accounts with the
boolean set would be receivable / payable accounts. So we're
considering using this information instead of the new boolean.
Does anybody have any additional information such as:
- there are some other kind of accounts where the party
sub-accounting can be used
- not every receivable/payable account entries must have a party
linked to them.
That would really help us make the right decision.
[1]: https://bugs.tryton.org/issue3731
[2]: http://codereview.tryton.org/14341002
--
Nicolas Évrard - B2CK SPRL
E-mail/Jabber: [email protected]
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
