On 02 Jan 14:39, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Mathias Behrle: " Re: [tryton] Revisiting product's type" (Fri, 2 Jan 2015 > 14:25:43 +0100): > > > Could you elaborate a bit more, why a Boolean couldn't serve this purposes? > > Just thinking a little bit further ;) I realize that a Boolean doesn't change > anything. Finally I think, that it shouldn't be necessary at all to define a > product as asset , but that a product should just behave like an asset, if it > is > used as asset.
Yes so you have to define two product one for goods and one for asset. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpFJtGBpQllU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
