2015-01-02 16:02 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>:

> On 02 Jan 15:32, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > To be honest, I was thinking more on the new asset modules and the fact
> > that some of our customers do asset mantenance for third parties and
> > frequently they really have sold the Good (that it is an asset from their
> > customer's POV). But then, I think that the asset_owner [1] module could
> > change the domain of product field on asset model to allow choosing goods
> > as well as assets.
>
> You mean the asset module:
>
>     http://codereview.tryton.org/5781002
>
> So I'm wondering if the product should not be optional but required if
> used for depreciation in account_asset module.
>

We're currently using the product just as a category. Is this asset a car,
a motorbike, etc. It wouldn't be strictly necessary.

I'm not sure, however, if to create an account_asset, an asset should be
required. It probably is consistent but it also forces the user to create a
new object he may not be interested in for somebody that just want to do
the accounting part.


>
> --
> Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
> Email/Jabber: [email protected]
> Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
> Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
>



-- 
Albert Cervera i Areny
Tel. 93 553 18 03
@albertnan
www.NaN-tic.com

Reply via email to