2015-10-20 21:53 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>:
> On 2015-10-20 21:17, Jordi Esteve wrote:
>> El 20/10/15 a les 19:24, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
>> >On 2015-10-20 19:07, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> >>2015-10-20 18:38 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>:
>> >>>Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>I was discussing about issue5016 [1] which is indeed a continuation of
>> >>>issue4410 [2] and I came with the idea that we should remove the
>> >>>invoice/credit_note type on the Invoice object.
>> >>>Such types are really a big constraint that prevent us to generate mixed
>> >>>documents (half invoice and half credit note).
>> >>>
>> >>>So the idea will be to migrate the credit note to negate the quantity
>> >>>and keep in type only 'in' / 'out' (aka 'supplier' / 'customer').
>> >>>
>> >>>The only difficulty will be for the sequence. Until now, we have the
>> >>>possibility to use different sequences for invoice and credit note. I
>> >>>think the way to manage such change will be to warn early enough users
>> >>>that such configuration will no more be possible in the future and so
>> >>>people should configure the next fiscalyear by using unique sequence for
>> >>>both types in prevision of the future migration.
>> >>We need both sequences in Spain as it is a legal requirement [1].
>> >Could you point to which page?
>>
>> Page 23:
>>
>> ====
>> Número y, en su caso, serie. La numeración de las facturas dentro de cada
>> serie debe ser correlativa
>>
>> Es obligatoria, en todo caso, la expedición en series específicas de las
>> facturas siguientes:
>> - Las rectificativas.
>> ====
>>
>> As Albert has said, credit notes could be removed and replaced by different
>> invoice sequences, like account_invoice_multisequence module [1] does.
>
> This doesn't say that invoice and credit note must have a different
> sequence.

It does. When it says that they need to be with specific sequences, it
means that they must be different from standard invoices. "Facturas
rectificativas" is the equivalent to credit notes.

> But of course, customization of the invoice numbering will still be
> possible. But they will have also to merge the two types.
>
>> >>Yet,
>> >>it should not be all that difficult to choose the sequence depending
>> >>on the sign of the invoice.
>> >I think if you have really this constraint, this means that you can not
>> >mix positive and negative lines on the same document otherwise it is not
>> >consistent.
>>
>> It depends, Spanish legal requirements for credit notes are strict (page
>> 38); summarizing credit notes in Spain must come from previous invoices. But
>> you can have negative amounts in sales/purchases and generate a single
>> invoice with mixed positive/negative amounts.
>
> So I don't see that it is a requirement to have separated sequences
> for each kind.
>

Indeed, in page 171 of the same document (and some other notes
elsewhere in the same document) it states that it is not possible to
have negative amounts in normal invoices if they are to invoice
returning goods. Those should always be in a "Factura rectificativa"
and should state the invoice of the goods that were delivered in the
first place.

It is my understanding that it would be possible to use a negative
amount on a line if that does not mean the returning of a good (for
example, when you have a deposit and you substract that amount on the
invoice which evantually is positive).

> --
> Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
> Email/Jabber: [email protected]
> Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
> Website: http://www.b2ck.com/



-- 
Albert Cervera i Areny
Tel. 93 553 18 03
@albertnan
www.NaN-tic.com

Reply via email to